ext_355374 ([identity profile] lynxreign.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lynxreign 2009-04-09 03:02 pm (UTC)

Yep, and that's fine. They'd also raise the salaries of all those people as much as they could so they wouldn't have to cut the people at the top as much.

Only 1.5% of people make over 250,000 a year. Over 1.5 million a year? I'd be surprised if it is .5% You'd likely only see .1% of earners needing a revision downward.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting