They just don't know how to think
Jul. 31st, 2008 09:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This morning on NPR there was a story about San Francisco. SF is a "sanctuary city". In other words, they don't automatically send every illegal they come across to the Feds for deportation. There was a protest and counter-protest there yesterday, described in the story teaser as a "clash", despite the protest being peaceful, though loud.
On the one side you had hundreds of people from immigrant's rights groups, on the other you had a dozen "Minutemen". You know about the "Minutemen", the idiots who have taken it upon themselves to "patrol" the border with Mexico.
The underlying cause for this appearance by the Asshats, sorry, the Minutemen, was a crime committed by an illegal immigrant. The immigrant in question is a minor who had already been arrested several times for violent crimes. The then committed a triple murder in a drive-by, using an AK-47. Horrible? Yes. Worthy of prison and/or deportation? Sure. However the underlying cause of this crime was not that he was an immigrant or an illegal immigrant.
It isn't as though no American citizen (of any race you care to choose) has ever committed murder. Surely no legal citizen has ever joined a gang or killed someone with a gun or performed a drive-by. I mean, if it weren't for the illegals, there'd be no gun violence or crime in the USA at all!
Using this crime as a prop for their xenophobic, racist crusade makes about as much sense as blaming the British for shipwrecks. It is a complete disconnect, but since so much of this country is completely irrational, they make the connection and get people to agree with them.
On the one side you had hundreds of people from immigrant's rights groups, on the other you had a dozen "Minutemen". You know about the "Minutemen", the idiots who have taken it upon themselves to "patrol" the border with Mexico.
The underlying cause for this appearance by the Asshats, sorry, the Minutemen, was a crime committed by an illegal immigrant. The immigrant in question is a minor who had already been arrested several times for violent crimes. The then committed a triple murder in a drive-by, using an AK-47. Horrible? Yes. Worthy of prison and/or deportation? Sure. However the underlying cause of this crime was not that he was an immigrant or an illegal immigrant.
It isn't as though no American citizen (of any race you care to choose) has ever committed murder. Surely no legal citizen has ever joined a gang or killed someone with a gun or performed a drive-by. I mean, if it weren't for the illegals, there'd be no gun violence or crime in the USA at all!
Using this crime as a prop for their xenophobic, racist crusade makes about as much sense as blaming the British for shipwrecks. It is a complete disconnect, but since so much of this country is completely irrational, they make the connection and get people to agree with them.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:07 pm (UTC)I think the point the Minutemen are making is more of a general system problem, that A)people here illegally shouldn't be here and should be deported, and B)if you know someone is here illegally, you have caught them committing crimes and have identified them as an illegal immigrant, why the hell is the person NOT deported, and in this case if they had been deported the murder wouldn't have happened. I don't think they are saying the underlying cause of the crime was his being an illegal alien, I think they are saying that because we had a way to address his illegal status and didn't take it that the crime was essentially allowed to happen.
I guess for me it is like when someone (nationality doesn't matter, could be a US citizen) is pulled over for speeding. Say a cop doesn't run them through the system, gives them a ticket/warning, and then lets them on the way. Then we find out later that this was someone with outstanding arrest warrants, and after going on his way the guy killed three people. We would fault the cop/system for not running the person though the database since the warrants would have popped up, the person would have been arrested, and the killings wouldn't have happened.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:20 pm (UTC)if you know someone is here illegally, you have caught them committing crimes and have identified them as an illegal immigrant, why the hell is the person NOT deported
Define the level of "crimes". The way the policy there is today, if the person is an adult and commits a felony, and they are an illegal immegrant, they are deported. The only reason this person wasn't is because he is a minor. SF is now reviewing that policy, but if a 6 year old kid steals an apple, do you ship him off to his country of origin?
people here illegally shouldn't be here and should be deported
1) And who takes the jobs they're doing? There are more illegal immigrants in this country than there are legal people who are unemployed.
2) Deporting that many people all at once will put a strain on the jobs market and cause inflation.
3) Deporting that many people all at once is a logistical nightmare
4) Deporting that many people all at once would cost a fortune
5) Finding the people to deport them is nigh impossible
The only way you're going to stop people from coming here is to somehow effectively punish the people giving them jobs without destroying the economy.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:40 pm (UTC)And therein lies the rub-- as long as there is money to be made by country club Republicans, this shall remain a wedge social issue that will deliberately remain unsolved and exploitable to fire up the base.
If individual in question were an American citizen,
Date: 2008-07-31 02:42 pm (UTC)And I am completely familiar with arguments you present, you and I have gone back and forth about them before. I still say "It's illegal". :)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:52 pm (UTC)The point is that if the person is/was an illegal alien there are ways it could have been handled that would have not resulted in the murders.
Sure and if we had better gun control laws or combatted gangs more effectively or had gotten this kid a job or put all brown people into camps or thrown the kid into jail for life on his first offense then the murders wouldn't have happened either.
In what way could you have handled this? Would you have deported a minor? Perhaps to a country he hasn't been to since he was an infant?
Would you have deported a minor
Date: 2008-07-31 03:04 pm (UTC)Bottom line, there are legal processes to go through for proper entry into the US and to remain here. Difficult? Yes. Nearly impossible for some? Yes. But my expectation is that just as I should follow the laws of another country to gain entry, so should people entering the US follow our laws. Break the law, face the consequences.
Re: Would you have deported a minor
From:Re: Would you have deported a minor
From:(no subject)
From:I'm glad to see you admit that it isn't as simple as "But they're illegal".
From:(no subject)
From:That's not an answer, that's a sound bite.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:23 pm (UTC)As it is, their beef appears to be entirely with Mexicans, so any of the yammerings of the Minutemen just come off as rationalizations for an ugly, racist witch-hunt.
They're a load of brownshirts and I have no use for them at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:38 pm (UTC)But yeah, it's mostly a 'scary brown people' thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 02:42 pm (UTC)You sure that wasn't the Daily Show?
As for the Canucks, I say bring 'em in by the busload. They're buying maps - these days, some of my best clients are Canadianni.
I say bring 'em in by the busload
Date: 2008-07-31 03:23 pm (UTC)There are minutemen branches in a lot of the Canadian border states.
Re: I say bring 'em in by the busload
From:Re: I say bring 'em in by the busload
From:Re: I say bring 'em in by the busload
From:so any of the yammerings of the Minutemen
Date: 2008-07-31 02:56 pm (UTC)I think they are targeting Mexicans because:
-Mexico immediately borders the US and has an obvious and documented problem with border security. Canada also has its problems, but we don't have the same level of problem there.
-When broken down by country of origin, Mexico accounts for over 1/2 of the estimated undocumented aliens.
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/illegal.pdf
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 03:05 pm (UTC)Don't kid yourself, they're targeting Mexicans because the Minutemen are a racist organization. If they weren't, you'd see some hispanics or blacks in the organization. You don't. They're White.
How did your ancestors get here again? I really don't remember.
Canadians = White has nothing to do with it.
Date: 2008-07-31 04:07 pm (UTC)Also in the report, of the 2.7 million illegals from Mexico, only 16 percent are overstays, meaning the person entered legally in the first place. 84% entered illegally from the get-go. Central America also has a low 26% of overstays with 74% entering illegally. The rest of the countries add up to 91% overstays, meaning only 9% entered illegally in the first place. And while the report doesn't address where those entering the country come through illegally, I am going to guess that it was at the Candian and Mexican Borders.
As for how I got here? Powerful white people seizing land of course! I have a couple of lines that go back to the Mayflower.
.
From:Re: .
From:Re: .
From:Re: so any of the yammerings of the Minutemen
Date: 2008-07-31 03:20 pm (UTC)I think they are targeting Mexicans because
Do you really? That might be you talking, there. I think that the folks actually packing their pickup trucks and shotguns into the desert and playing at border patrol, or at least pretending that they would while showing up at rallies, are a different kettle of fish.
I think our immigration laws are wrongheaded
Date: 2008-07-31 03:56 pm (UTC)True motives are hard to determine, though many of the minutemen are probably racist, but the facts are the facts as far as which country makes up the biggest part of the illegal immigration pie. And targeting that country and the obviously porous border with that country seems to be a logical choice.
Re: I think our immigration laws are wrongheaded
From:Re: I think our immigration laws are wrongheaded
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:and partly a nation of power and priviledge
From:(no subject)
From:So until the laws are enforced evenly and unjust laws are eradicated, why pick this one to enforce?
From:MÌÁ ÀV¶+°àk@Éaàн$~üOfã=£©ÅD^! ¹8zð¡¦Q?ÙÙªýLýî讹Ä
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: so any of the yammerings of the Minutemen
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-08-01 03:22 pm (UTC) - ExpandWhat if...
Date: 2008-07-31 03:31 pm (UTC)I don't see how we "win" by making immigration so goddamn difficult. Hell, just to get our darling boy immigrated here cost $600 and 3-4 months of paperwork and that was completed befgore 9/11.(not discussing the rest of the adoption fees/process).
Re: What if...
Date: 2008-07-31 03:41 pm (UTC)Of course, you could reduce the burden on businesses by instituting national health care and pay for it with the increase in revenue from the newly taxed residents.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 01:24 am (UTC)And it should be made more straightforward to legally immigrate to this country, because there's no real point in having laws unless you mean them.
And we should have national health care.
And gay marriage should be legal everywhere.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 01:07 pm (UTC)As to the rest, I agree.
Minutemen
Date: 2008-08-01 03:13 pm (UTC)http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=pvfvaUZkcPU&feature=email
Don S
Minuteman AZ
Re: Minutemen
Date: 2008-08-01 04:06 pm (UTC)Re: Minutemen
Date: 2008-08-01 04:22 pm (UTC)Re: Minutemen
Date: 2008-08-01 04:24 pm (UTC)